60% Cesarean Rate and NOBODY is paying attention

May 09th 2008

So, in noticing the alarming number of women in the May 08 Expecting Club having c-sections, I decided to do a little informal research.  I spent about 20 minutes sorting through the first 43 birth stories I found and guess what?  Oh, just guess….. come on….. It's right there in the Subject……………

Yes, out of 43 births, 26 of those were by c-section.  That is a whopping 60% c/s rate, and we're only a week into May.  It's obviously not slowing down, and it looks like I'm the ONLY person who noticed it.  It's a good thing I don't post on Ivillage anymore because I'd be seriously trying to wake those women up right now, which wouldn't make me any friends.  People really cannot handle the truth.

Well, what are you gonna do?  America is experiencing a birth crisis right now, and it seems to only be getting worse.  Yes, I blame the greedy doctors and insurance companies, but I blame the women even more.  Women are being subjugated by letting the very thing that makes them a woman be silently stripped away. The ability to produce human life WITHOUT any involvement from modern medicine is a great gift…. and here we are, letting a male-dominated industry convince us that we're not capable of it.  I do truly believe that what keeps women from being the more dominant gender is the fact that very few women question the status quo.  When Betty Frieden admitted she wanted to work outside the home, the other women who were trapped in theirs told her to shut up.  When the suffragettes fought for our right to vote, many women took the men's side, afraid of rocking the boat and losing the few privileges that came along with being a powerless wife.  Do I even need to remind people of Thalidomide babies?  Women listened to their "expert" doctors then and look what horrific epidemic came out of that.

And here we are now… letting doctors tell us our bodies are too broken to give birth, because inductions and c-sections seem so appealing those last few miserable weeks of pregnancy.  It's too bad so many women who fall victim to this realize all too late how much damage they are doing to themselves.  I am one of those women.  No matter what, my first c-section will affect every pregnancy I'm ever blessed with.  And I will never get over that.

I also have a sneaking suspicion that the shear existence of these Expecting Clubs is totally unhealthy to the pregnancy process.  I mean, when else in your life would you know of SO MANY women due around your due date?  And when you're pregnant and uncomfortable, and you see other women having their babies before you (even if they're due weeks before you) you get miserably jealous and start thinking it's a great idea to kick your fetus out too.  I understand.  I felt the same exact way during my last pregnancy, especially because I was due at the END of the month (and actually delivered on the first of the next month) and it seemed like everyone in the whole wide world was having their baby except me.

God, that was so unhealthy.  And here I am with a uterine scar because of my impatience.

Well, I digress.  These women are strangers and as much as I care about the health of ALL women, I can't do anything about this horrifying 60% c/s rate.  All I can do is keep MYSELF informed and educated, and hope that other women learn what I have learned about the miracle of birth.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Earth Mama Angel Baby


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Ummm...yeah. It is scary. I'm pregnant with my 5th, and stopped doing the Expecting clubs during my 3rd pregnancy.
Now here is a winner of a post on yours...a mom who is actually UPSET that her Dr. is telling her that she doesn't need to schedule a cesarean, she can attempt vaginal birth. http://messageboards.ivillage.com/n/mb/message.asp... I get the impression that she may have been told previously that she has a "big baby" and should have surgery without even attempting labor. Sad, just sad.

60% c/s rate?! Disgusting, but not surprising. I really think that someday we will look back at this cesarean-crazed point in our birth history, and be horrified. Just as we were (and will always be) with "twilight sleep" and Thalidomide.

I had done the math too after reading so many of the birth stories and it just horrifies me. What I find amusing is that the three twin pregnancies were all delivered vaginally.

Hi Jenn,
Nice to see you! I guess this is the sort of thing many women have to find out the hard way. I'm meeting so many women these days who knew they wanted a totally natural birth from the get-go, and I wonder "but how did you know that when society convinces us it's not possible?!?!?" I NEVER would have considered birth without modern medicine before, and most of my family still thinks I'm nuts for not just getting "sectioned" again.... but I realize that is only ignorance talking. When I told my uncle's wife that I didn't want the epidural this time she looked at me like I had completely lost my mind.
I can only hope that movies like The Business of Being Born get out to the masses and wake women up before we end up at a 100% c/s rate.

I found your blog months ago through the Expecting Club and you are correct - I don't think that anyone has noticed or mentioned the c-section rate! The numbers scare me but after The Business of Being Born I have to say that I am not surprised. I hope that more first timers will consider hiring a good doula or midwife or otherwise learn what their bodies are capable of. Somehow the idea of c/s as major surgery seems to be lost on most women. Before being in this situation myself and doing the research I found myself thinking that a nice scheduled c/s would be the way to go...

You will probably understand my reaction to this.
Earlier this week, while at the library in a very upscale neighborhood, I was in the bathroom when I heard two women talking. One asked the other about her pregnancy and the pregnant one said, "Only 2 more days." The first one asked if she was having a c-section and when the pregnant one said, "Yes," the other one said, "Oh good." WHAT? WHY?
I wanted to run away.
Oh and Christina Aguilera and Britney have always baffled me. WTF? You're worried about tearing, so you'll agree to be SLICED OPEN? WHAT?

(1) Christina Aguilera had an elective C-Section because she was scared of having a natural birth. More specifically, she was afraid of the "tearing" that she heard so much about. (source: UK's Daily Mail)
(2)Thalidomide babies- man, that's some scary shit. The women who took this medication back in the day were having nausea and such and instead of turning to mother nature to help relieve them of this, they turned to their doctor instead. BIG mistake. BTW, I know that in Canada, there is quite a few groups for the unfortunate babies that have survived this ordeal and have been able to reach adulthood. By no means should one infer that these people are "normal". The deformities are widespread and are quite severe, too.
(3) You should become a nurse and then later a midwife. No, really. Not only is nursing a secure job that pays lots of $$$, but then YOU can help these women that you have described in this post and in time previous. YOU can make a difference as Florence Nightingale had in the late 1800s. You're already a woman warrior (no relation to the novel by the same title, though) and you should spread the "gospel" that you preach in order for the health and well-being of other women just like YOU. Think about it...