Guest Post: What a B.S. in Biology and a Slew of Women’s Studies Courses Never Taught Me About My Own Body

Nov 16th 2011

By Kim Buettner-Garrett 

I’ve never been a fan of most conventional birth control methods. Even before my skepticism of pharmaceuticals and mainstream gynecology had developed, the idea of taking hormones to prevent pregnancy really made me uneasy. And the mere thought of inserting a hunk of metal into my uterus to create a “hostile” environment for a fertilized egg (leading to possibly heavier and more painful periods) also made my stomach turn — I don’t want to make any part of my body “hostile”, thank you very much. In college, I worked for a project about the history of embryology and wrote numerous articles on the development of the pill. I knew its ins and outs, and my discomfort continued to grow. Basically, my inner feminist was angry that the most common forms of birth control available to women (namely hormones and IUDs) had the potential to harm my body, whereas the most common form of birth control for men (condoms) had little potential for harm, less a potential latex allergy. *Insert rant about medical patriarchy here*.

I’ve been with my now-husband since our teens, and we have “learned” a lot of things together. For us, condoms and creativity allowed for the avoidance of hormones. Wanting a little more freedom and a little less rubber, I went on a knowledge trek to see what other hormone-fearing women were doing. Many were satisfied with their copper Ts but, being the controlling gal that I am, I wasn’t comfortable leaving my fertility up to a metal implant. I began to get frustrated at my contraceptive choices:

  • Pills, rings, or patches that could cause blood clots, weight gain, loss of libido, and a slew of other conditions caused by messing with normal hormone cycling
  • An implant (either with or without hormones) that tends to cause heavier, more painful periods, or could potentially get infected or perforate my uterus
  • Diaphragms, cervical caps, or female condoms with a big ol’ dollop of spermicide—no thanks!
  • Abstinence—ha!

Or our current routine, which we were wanting to mix up.

*Sigh* There HAD to be a better way!


Enter Taking Charge of Your Fertility by Toni Weschler. Now this sounded like something I could get on board with — taking charge is what I do. I stumbled upon this book, ordered it online, and read it cover to cover with intensity. I brought it to work with me and enlightened my coworkers about cervical fluid, hormone patterns, and botched infertility treatments (you’ll thank me someday, ladies!) I was excited, intrigued, and angry — how did I not understand my own body? Somewhere along the line, from early health, science, and sex education to my bachelor’s in Biology, my education failed me. Somewhere along the line, I failed to question conventional knowledge about fertility.

A sampling of the information gems I found in this treasure trove of insight:

  1. Contrary to popular belief, women cannot get pregnant any time of the month (sounds ridiculous, but as I young woman, I didn’t freaking know this and none of my well-educated lady friends did either). The basis of the Fertility Awareness Method (NOT to be confused with the very flawed Rhythm Method) is daily temperature and cervical fluid charting to reveal periods of low and high fertility. You can use this information to both achieve (given no other fertility issues) and avoid pregnancy. Brilliant.
  2. There is this thing called cervical fluid that all women have and it changes throughout the month. Many women think it’s an infection because we’ve never been told that it’s normal (particularly when women are fertile and the fluid is abundant). So do their docs, who prescribe them antibiotics month after month to rid them of said ‘discharge’. Yes, that’s right — DOCTORS prescribe MEDICINE to get rid of NORMAL body fluid. Fluid that is essential for the continuation of our species because sperm would die without it. But heaven forbid we acknowledge that women’s bodies make something that a “male” entity is dependent on.
  3. Many couples with fertility problems spend tens of thousands of dollars on treatments that will never work because their doctor assumes they ovulate on day 14 of their cycle, and thus the treatments fail because they apply it too early or too late if a woman’s body doesn’t conform to this average ovulation timing.
  4.  The combined mistakes of assuming day 14 ovulation, poor ultrasound fetal measurements, and doctors not trusting women regarding conception dates result in some women being induced when they were “overdue” only to birth tiny babies that were actually premature and aged incorrectly. This “mistake” has a name — iatrogenic, or medically-caused.

I believe this book is essential reading for all women. Even if you are satisfied with your current form of contraception or find charting to be a daunting task, you can learn so, so much from TCOYF. I now have a greater understanding and appreciation for the way my body works, and the reassurance that everything is working just as intended — no antibiotics necessary.

About the Author…

Kim Buettner-Garrett is a first year MPH student with a focus on Health Communication. She is a woman of many passions, including women’s health, nutrition, animal behavior, and healthy living.

After graduate school, she plans to get certified as a doula, serve as a women’s health educator, and add some little B-Gs to the household.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Earth Mama Angel Baby


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
olweneleanor 5 pts

I was a huge proponent of fertility charting- until I had an unplanned pregnancy! I was nine months postpartum, breastfeeding, and certainly not wanting to be on any kind of hormonal contraception- so ovulation thermometer, here we go. Temp spiked on day 12 (whoo me!), and continued on as expected. Except for the lack of menstruation....early ultrasound was able to date conception to about day 27 of my cycle, when I had unprotected sex because I was supposed to be in the clear. Instead, I had a second ovulation (just glad now it didn't result in twins).

On the plus side, being aware of my fertility made me not worry when the doc couldn't find a heartrate when the fetus was supposed to be 13 weeks- because I knew it couldn't possibly be that old. On the downside, unexpected pregnancies kind of suck. I was really upset at losing my breastfeeding relationship with my firstborn, reentering the land of vomit, and losing any chance I had at finishing my graduate work. In the end, of course, I'm extremely happy about the child I ended up having. I do wish I could have planned his arrival better, though.

pinkpoetlikeme 5 pts

Love FAM!!! Helped us get pregnant in one cycle! and i'm planing on Ecological breastfeeding to naturally space our children. Suck it to the hormone tablets!

KimBG 6 pts

Thank you all for your great comments and stories! I am thrilled to hear that the Catholic church has done away with the rhythm method and is employing FAM instead.

I had so much fun writing this--thank you for the opportunity, Gina!

Marissa C 6 pts

Actually, I have to point out that my "crotchety old backwards" Church was first on this one! Dr. John Billings (a Catholic) developed NFP back in the 1950s and it evolved from there. The Rhythm method was really abandoned by the late 1960s, but of course it persists (unfortunately) today. Toni Weschler started teaching in the early 80s and didn't write TCOYF until 1995. Until that point, only Catholics were using NFP/FAM--she was the first secular source.

So don't get me wrong...I am SO glad TCOYF has brought FAM to the secular world, but the Catholic Church actually had this one "right" before anyone else. Who knew, right?

KimBG 6 pts

Huh, very interesting! I wonder if that's never really come to light with the non-Catholic world since other birth control methods were gaining in popularity in the 60s and NFP/FAM were still thought of as the faulty rhythm method (as they commonly still are).

Well, I'm very grateful for Weschler for bringing it into the secular world or else we non-Catholic women would be left in the dark! It's too bad that the rhythm method continues to persist despite better information being available, but such is life, eh?

Marissa C 6 pts

KimBG Yeah...I'm assuming a lot of it is bias & outdated attitudes. The Catholic users of NFP/FAM still get lots of flack because they tend to still have big families...even if every child was planned! 90-something % of Catholics still use artificial birth control--I actually know more non-Catholics who use NFP/FAM than Catholics. We're a very tiny minority. I'm happy it's made it to the secular world so people can look at it as a wonderful method without any religious bias.

Marissa C 6 pts

YES YES YES YES! My parents used this method successfully for almost 25 years to plan their children and were "NFP Promoters" (volunteer role in Church) growing up. I always knew I was going to use NFP growing up and my husband and I love it. We use the CCL version, which is the same as TCOYF, without condoms. It really has been great for our marriage and it made conceiving easy--my temperatures pointed to my current pregnancy before a test could! My husband is a geek and thinks the charts are cool--I think it is really important that he is part of the birth control decision and has responsibility himself. He keeps up with the chart and knows where I am in my cycle and when things are a "go."

I hate the misconceptions, even among Catholics, that this is the Rhythm Method...far from it. I'm pretty sure my husband will learn nothing about it in med school either--we'll find out in a year when he does his ob/gyn rotation.

Even if I were not Catholic, I wouldn't stop using this method. The benefits to my marriage and health are worth any hassle. My fertility is way too important to me to mess with it in any way, hormonal or physical.

Finally, the false assertions that NFP doesn't work or has a low rate of effectiveness DRIVE ME NUTS. NFP works...if you follow the rules. If you don't, yes, you might get pregnant. But if you don't follow the directions for any other sort of birth control, you can get pregnant just as easily...except you don't even know when you're ovulating! NFP "oops" babies tend to be "What the hell" babies :) Studies that paint NFP with a low rate of effectiveness tend to assume "Perfect Use" for the Pill, etc. but not with NFP.

Ironically, I know more "oops" babies conceived on the Pill than I do from NFP!

irishfan1113 6 pts

DH and I were required to take an NFP course prior to us getting married in the Catholic Church so we were taught all this super cool stuff about cycles and how everything works (btw, they did pan the rhythm method because it's so inaccurate nearly all the time). Thanks for posting about this method! Also, for the women asking about things that affect fertility, I highly recommend Maryiln Shannon's book Fertility, Cycles & Nutrition.

CaffdCatholicMa 19 pts

irishfan1113 I will second Fertility, Cycles and Nutrition

DoNotFaint 8 pts

I was also amazed at what I learned about my body! Hormonal birth control gives me incredibly painful and frequent migraines, and we're planning to try for a baby next year. A friend recommended this book, and I was so excited to learn all the stuff we never learned in biology. It's a crime that we usually only learn when to expect a period and how to buy tampons when they're teaching us about our cycles.

JenSchimanke 5 pts

Migraines + hormonal BC greatly increases your risk of stroke!

DoNotFaint 8 pts

My MD and GYN put me on it to regulate my hormones, thinking that would get rid of the migraines. No one mentioned stroke...

JenSchimanke 5 pts

DoNotFaint My MD sent me to a neurologist because she was concerned about migraines and he was the one who told me. The cause strokes for the same reason they cause blood clots. Migraines, he said, occur when the blood vessels in your brain are constricted. Constricted brain blood vessels, plus BC's increased likelihood of blod clots are what increases the risk of stroke.

DoNotFaint 8 pts

JenSchimanke Wow. My Neurologist didn't say that, either! I'll never go back on BC anyway, since it made life impossible. But that's a bit scary anyway. (5 migraines a week? No thanks! And no more, since I threw out the NuvaRing!)

cathymat 5 pts

DoNotFaintJenSchimanke I just went to a neurologist two weeks ago and was told the same thing about BC, migraine, and stroke. She was so glad that I was already using NFP and told me to never use BC pills and to contact her about any hormone replacement therapy. Lower doses of estrogen and migraine can lead to stroke too.

Corissa 15 pts

I just found this book through drmomma.org! I have a friend who is having some trouble conceiving her second child after a misscarrage. I thought this might be helpful so I am going to buy it for her for Christmas. Does it have anything about outside influences on firtility like diet or smoking? I wanted to say something to her about smoking while trying to get pregnant but I think it would be out of place or feel like an attack so i figured it would be better if I gave her a book about general firtility that has something in it about that... Any suggestions?

TheFeministBreeder 56 pts moderator

Corissa I'm not judgmental about too many things, but smoking and pregnancy is a HUGE pet peeve of mine. With anything that has risks/benefits to consider, I'm very pro-choice. But there are NO health benefits to smoking during pregnancy. But to answer your question, yes, there are a lot of studies and books on how diet and environmental factors interfere with fertility. You friend needs to treat her body right BEFORE she gets pregnant. The occasional junkfood is one thing. Inhaling carcinogens that damage a fetus is entirely another.

Corissa 15 pts

TheFeministBreeder I don't think she considers herself smoking durring pregnancy because as soon as she finds out she is pregnant she stops cold turkey. However, I don't think she realizes that she doesn't know she is pregnant those first few weeks and I believe the smoking is hurting her chances of becoming pregnant and played a key role in her miscarrage. I think she is just uneducated about it, so I am trying to figure out a way to educate her without sounding like I am saying that she killed her baby or something...

AngelWardMattes 5 pts

Yes, yes, YES! I could've written this post myself. I'm so happy to have found the FAM! I actually have a 43-day cycle, so my gynecologist was always putting me on one pill or another to "regulate" me. They all caused weight gain, severe headaches, and acne. Not to mention how uneasy I felt about putting hormones into my body. And I've never been a fan of condoms. I wish I would've read this book years ago!!

ShiningLghtPE 9 pts

Agreed that the book is a must read.... however this method is exactly how we got pregnant with my beautiful daughter! I charted, assessed my cervical fluid, etc... then lo and behold, after being spot-on regular for YEARS I ovulate 3 days early. So yes, this can work, but not when the universe has other plans.

JenSchimanke 5 pts

It is scary that women and drs are unaware of normal cervical fluid, and the fact that not everyone's fertility cycle is the same...but maybe that's an American thing. Here in Canada, they taught us both those things in grade 6 sex education.

KimBG 6 pts

JenSchimanke That is awesome that you were taught these things as a child. Our country's sex education program has a looooong way to go. And yet we continue to wonder why half of all pregnancies in this country are unplanned...

erinroady 5 pts

Have the book, love it, hate charting. Therefore, my husband and I have found some technological help (along with the use of condoms on fertile days versus straight-up abstinence, when trying to avoid pregnancy) that makes the whole NFP/FAM process easier and more enjoyable. I strongly recommend that everyone interested in this method, whether for conception aid or contraception, look into FertilityFriend dot com. You input your temps, it charts for you. It provides projected ovulation dates (and then confirms the actual ovulation date after a three day temp rise), projected period start dates, and in the case of use as a conception aid, has lots of features to help you get pregnant. They also have a great mobile site/app that makes it ideal for use on a cell phone so you don't have to drag yourself out of bed or start up a laptop to record your temps. You can also search charts that are like yours, etc. It is free to use with optional paid upgrades (which I wouldn't recommend unless you were fastidiously trying to become pregnant). Also of interest are a set of fertility monitors: the Lady Comp and the Baby Comp. These are all-in-one units that take and store your temperature. They "learn" your body over the course of a few months and will provide projected ovulation dates. They provide you each day with a colored light (Green, red, or yellow) signaling whether you are ok to have unprotected sex/not fertile, do not have unprotected sex/fertile, and trasition/learning/better safe than sorry. (Note that the lights will have different meanings depending on whether you are trying for a baby or not.) I DO NOT WORK FOR EITHER OF THESE SITES/MANUFACTURERS IN ANY CAPACITY! I just really love their products and services. :)

TheFeministBreeder 56 pts moderator

@Erinroady - YES. I LOVE FertilityFriend.com. I use that site.

CourtneyHelms 6 pts

TCOYF was such an eye-opener for me! And that feels like an understatement. It also helped us successfully avoid pregnancy for 3 months, and then achieve pregnancy on the first cycle we attempted. I believe it should be required reading for all young women.

KatyLinda 6 pts

I agree that TCOYF is a MUST read for women. I recommend it to all my friends. It's so full of great info that no one else teaches you!

SarahWappler 5 pts

I used this book to prevent pregnancy and then to conceive our first child. When I called the gyn to seek prenatal care I was told to come in for a pregnancy test and that they weren't interested in the actual date of conception (which I knew exactly). I knew their dates would be off for me since I had a 21 day cycle! I knew then I needed to seek alternate care for myself and my gestating baby. I went on to have 3 great homebirths- 2 in the water. This book should be required reading for all sexually active women!

TheFeministBreeder 56 pts moderator

SarahWappler Totally! I don't ovulate until Day 21, so all those charts trying to use my LMP to estimate a due date are totally wrong. Growing up, I always thought I got my period a week late every month (you have NO idea how many pregnancy scares this caused over my reproductive life.) As it turns out, my cycles are 36-38 days long. Way longer than the "normal" (or what we think is normal.) Did any doctor ever tell me this? Nope! Did they even know? Probably not!

Canadienne29 5 pts

I'm the same (well, different - my cycles are 21-24 days long and I ovulate on days 10-12). I knew exactly the date my son was conceived (husband and I were long-distance at the time so I knew exactly when I'd ovulated and had sex) and none of the doctors would listen to me, so their due date for my son was a week later than mine based on conception. He arrived in week 39 - one day before the due date I had calculated. We use NFP, with condoms during my fertile period. It's working pretty well for us. :)

The Good Wife 7 pts

I have long cycles as well and the cycle we got pregnant with our daughter, I didn't even ovulate until Day 35. I am glad I was able to prove the day of conception, since the nurse wanted to date me further along. I loved that the book help me understand my body and that it could be so predictable. At first my husband was skeptical, but after I yelled to him "It's science, jackass. Not voodoo!" he shut the hell up. We have been using the FAM for a little over 3 years now and it has been great.

CaffdCatholicMa 19 pts

Yay! I am so happy when the FAM is brought up as not just some crazy Catholic thing! FAM is the basis of Natural Family Planning except during fertile times, the couple chooses to abstain rather than use condoms or another contraceptive if they feel a child is not right for them at the time.

DH and I have been using NFP for the last 4 years (since after DD1) was born and we have the two girls. I, personally, always reacted badly to hormonal birth control and I have a latex allergy, plus as I became more knowledgable about my faith, I learned why the Church does not condone artificial contraception and I agree with the reasons. Is it work? Yes. Does it take communication? Yes. Do you become really aware of your body's natural functions? Yes. Does it take a bit of control (if you are going the full NFP route?) Oh, yeah. But is it worth it? I think so!

EG 5 pts

"plus as I became more knowledgable about my faith, I learned why the Church does not condone artificial contraception and I agree with the reasons."Can you please elaborate on this? Having been raised Catholic and being very invested in my faith at a young age, I remember what I was taught about birth control (and it was typically very irrational). I would love to know some better reasons the Church dissuades its use. I am sincerely curious and in no way trying to start a flame war. I appreciate religiosity and various opinions. If you'd prefer to e-mail me, feel free! elizabeth(dot)geras(at)gmail(dot)com. Thank you.

Marissa C 6 pts

EG The very high level answer is that Catholics believe sex is an integral part of marriage and by using artificial birth control, spouses are holding back part of themselves from each other. It has nothing to do with wanting to "overrun the world with Catholics" or anything like that.

That doesn't sound like a good answer on the face to me either...you really have to dive much deeper to get what they are really talking about--and it is a beautiful teaching!

Pope Paul VI first covered it in Humanae Vitae (not an easy read) and Pope John Paul II went in more depth with the Theology of the Body.

Christopher West does an excellent job of explaining it in a way that is accessible to everyone. I highly recommend his book "Good News About Sex and Marriage" or check out his website below:

http://www.christopherwest.com/

Best of luck!

CaffdCatholicMa 19 pts

HI EG! What a great question and I am really happy that Marissa C answered it! What she says in spot on. I've read many of Christopher West's books and he does a great job explaining it. "Good News about Sex and Marriage" is in Q and A format and you can skip around as needed. He also has one explaining the Theology of the Body. At our core, Catholics are in fact very sexy people and not ashamed of the body at all. Many people are surprised at what we do believe!

CaffdCatholicMa 19 pts

EG Another great book to consider is "Holy Sex" by Gregory Popcak.

foodbabymama 5 pts

The Garden of Fertility by Katie Singer is another book with similar information (http://www.amazon.com/Garden-Fertility-Charting-Pr...).

I think it's funny that my first exposure to FAM was when I went to a Catholic marriage prep class.

ErinOK 5 pts

Thanks for giving me something to think about. I got a copper T after having my son, and I do wonder about what effects it has on me besides keeping me from getting pregnant. I have been working on getting my body & spirit in balance, and a hunk of metal in the uterus, hmmm. . .

I read this book years ago and used this method for five years before deciding to get pregnant, which I then did the first try. Well, I didn't check temperature, so my method was kind of an advanced rhythm method, paying attention to fluid & other bodily signs and estimating a bit. I acknowledged some risk to that, worked in extra "careful" days, but also was prepared to accept accidentally getting pregnant.

Now I very much do not want any accidents (and was tired of using condoms during fertile periods, which is usually when I most want to have sex), so I feel that the iud is my best option. . . but I'll be paying close attention to my body for any signs of discontent. And considering that I could do this method with less risk than I did before. I did really enjoy how in touch with my body I was when I was charting my cycle.

KimBG 6 pts

ErinOK Thanks for the comment! Ha, yes my only complaint about all of it is that now I am fully aware that my increased libido is going hand in hand with increased fertility. We just get more creative :) Damn nature and its reproductive agenda...haha.

MichelleMcGee 6 pts

I don't believe in BC. It makes me feel crazy. I love being "natural" and hubby just are careful around time of OV. It has worked for us for over 5 years and we were able to get pregnant quickly when we wanted to!

tonialuscianna 5 pts

AMEN!!!! I found this book while trying for our second, and was in AWE of all I didnt know. I recommend it to everyone! Im almost looking forward to the awkward conversations over this book when my daughter gets a little older.

Remedy1818 7 pts

I love this book! We were able to get pregnant after following it for a few months while we had been under my doctor day 14 sex and taking the ovulation tests. Oh yeah, I have PCOS and a 35 day cycle so the ovulation tests do not work for me, I have 4 days of positive and sometimes I don't ovulate! Only the charting and cervical fluid really helped. On another rant about "doctors" I just had my NT scan. The perinatal doctor wanted to change my due date from the conception date to my last period (a week earlier because of my long cycle) because my baby is big. HELLO....I know the conception date with absolute certainty, why would I want to have an earlier projected date so you can try to induce me when I'm not LATE? Grrrr....

ElsabieOrris 7 pts

OMG I am in the exact same boat.... Does my head in! Remedy1818

Thinkbirth 5 pts

You've written a very important post here Kim. For the skeptics, so glad you have had good experiences, but for many, the comments here are true and as Gina says, practice is practitioner and locality dependant. I don't know the book you mention Kim, but clearly need to buy it.

Some of you may be interested in a post on my blog by Gail Dahl on hormonal contraception as chemical castration http://thinkbirth.blogspot.com/2010/04/birth-contr...

Another brilliant resource is the Beautiful Cervix Project - a series of photographs of cervical changes throughout the menstrual cycle created by a student midwife - just beautiful! http://www.beautifulcervix.com/ please don't look though if you are likely to be offended as she has had trouble with people reporting her site for inappropriate content. Her site is a brilliant resource for those of us who teach and share information.

Thanks again for the great post Kim and thanks too Gina for being prepared to discuss the 'tough' issues.

:) Carolyn

RoxBuckman 8 pts

How wonderful to read this! I just recently went through this same discovery process. I have been on the pill and the patch and hated every second both of them. From all the complications (two week long periods, crazy mood swings, etc.) to the knowledge that I was pumping my body full of hormones, I finally said enough was enough. Like the author, I was frustrated by the lack of options. My husband and I just recently started the temperature and mucus tracking method and feel such a relief. Unfortunately, most people I talk to just dismiss me with "oh, you're sooo going to get pregnant". Good to know others are trying to start this same conversation!

MistyPratt 5 pts

Anyone else having trouble with these comments? Anyway, I just typed up a big long comment that was deleted. In short: just bought this book, love it, and look forward to using the methods described. For eco-junkies out there, did you know that if you're on the Pill, you're peeing estrogen into our water system? Which doesn't get filtered out? This shocked me! I have also used an IUD, which I recently had removed, because it felt really abnormal never to have a period, and it also caused a lot of acne. Thanks for this post, I am going to share/link!

CaffdCatholicMa 19 pts

MistyPratt great point about the estrogens in the water! Its really doing a number on aquatic life (fish/frogs spontaneously switching sex) plus there is a theory that it's also the reason kids are hitting puberty earlier. I'll see if I can find the article.