Hold Enfamil Accountable for Lying to Parents

May 21st 2010

Go over to your television right now and turn on Nickelodeon.  Watch this channel for 10 minutes.  Okay, maybe 15.  In that time, you WILL see a commercial for Enfamil formula making ridiculous claims about their product.  I know this because every time I turn on Dora or Diego, I see this offensive commercial.  Enfamil’s official claim is that:

“Our new Triple Health Guard is found only in Enfamil Premium. The result of years of leading edge research, new Enfamil Premium is clinically proven to promote growth, improve* brain and eye development, and improve* respiratory and immune system outcomes.”

This claim is such egregious falsehood, in fact, that the National Advertising Division released this statement calling for Mead Johnson (who owns Enfamil) to “modify, discontinue certain claims for Enfamil Premium.” After an investigation into the claims, NAD made the following assessment:

Following its review of the evidence, NAD determined that the advertising at issue conveyed the message that that the product was the only infant formula that offered the three advertised benefits, a message that was not supported by the evidence in the record.

And not to worry, there’s already been a class-action lawsuit filed against Mead Johnson for claiming that they are the only formula who offers these benefits, when in fact, their formula is the same exact formula you’ll find in most generic tubs like Parent’s Choice or the Target brand..

This certainly isn’t the first time that Mead Johnson has tried to make fools out of their consumers.  Remember, they’re now selling chocolate-flavored formula, just in case your formula-fed child’s risk of developing obesity or diabetes wasn’t quite high enough.

We, as consumers, can stop this madness.  Blog this, tweet this, facebook this, and spread the word.  As the author of this article pointed out, we blogging moms have the power to make our voices heard.

Help people understand why it’s important to stop purchasing from a company who tells lies to unsuspecting parents.  Stop purchasing from a company who sells products that most people assume are an April Fool’s joke until they discover that no, in fact, Enfamil IS trying to sell your baby chocolate in a bottle.  And if there was ever a better reason to promote breastfeeding, it’s to stop lining the pockets of a company whose scruples are non-existent, and has no problem affording the attorneys who will bail them out of the lies.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Earth Mama Angel Baby


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Who makes Target's? (*currently researching*) I checked today, and everything there is either Enfamil, Target's brand, or a Nestle-owned product. We have to do part-formula (primarily breastfeeding) and I want to make very good choices for formula.

I never knew what to do with all those formula samples I'd get, and boy did they push them on me, and I'm a breastfeeding counselor! I once opened the door to the UPS lady while breastfeeding my infant (yes, you can walk and nurse at the same time!) to find that a company had sent me an entire case of free formula. I looked at the lady and said, "Um..I won't be needing this" and she just shrugged her shoulders. "Well, they sent it." It sat in my garage until the expiration date. I was going to donate it to a woman's shelter, but it really went against my grain to pass on the formula marketing. I'd rather donate lactation services instead.

When my third came around, the nurse at the hospital was adamant that I take that free sample home with me. "What if breastfeeding doesn't work?" Or my favorite, "What if she needs to eat in the car?" Yeah, that's a good reason to sabotage our breastfeeding experience and my child's health! I just left it on the counter when I finally got to leave the hospital.

I went to a Baby Expo once with my breastfeeding toddler and got "Toddler" samples pushed on me. I mean, what the heck is this? It's not enough that they makes tons of money on babies, but they want to keep on doing it once they are out of bottles! I politely declined, telling the salesman that my daughter was still nursing. He simply said, "Well you can give her this when she weans." Do they really think we can't nourish our children with FOOD? That everything has to come out of a can?

I also love how we are told not to start our babies on cow's milk for the first year, and to avoid soy. Yet those are the first ingredients found in formula today.

Formula has it's place, but it should be like a last resort in a hospital or for the rare mother that cannot make milk or the very rare baby that cannot digest human milk. (Most cases of breastfeeding failure are really cases of breastfeeding management failure and lack of help- not something inherently wrong with mom or baby.) Formula cans should not come with a label touting advantages. They should come instead with warning lables, like on cigarettes and alcohol.

And before I get attacked, let me clarify that I'm not attacking mothers who use formula. I'm attacking unethical formula companies who dupe moms into thinking that their formula is just as good and safe as breastmilk. It's not.

Thanks, Gina, for calling them out!

*steps down from soapbox and runs away*

Thanks for this. I just linked to it on my blog. What a bunch of BS!
.-= suzanne´s last blog ..But is it free? =-.

They say the proof of the pudding is in the eating, but apparently the proof of the breastmilk/formula is in the pooping, according to a new study that analyzed the poop of breastfed and formula-fed infants. It looked at the intestinal cells shed in baby poop, and a comparison found that there are actual cellular differences between BF'd and FF'd infants. http://futurity.org/health-medicine/breast-milk-tr....

Chocolate formula? Are you freaking kidding me? INSANE. I work in diabetes research and this is completely and utterly insane. Thanks for making me aware.
.-= geekymummy´s last blog ..two memes with one stone =-.

There will never be truth in advertising....it is just that we wish for all the things that affect our children...formula, food, toys etc..that these companies would be held up or could hold themselves to a higher standard.

I get that they are trying to reassure the consumers or help in assuage in our non breastfeeding guilt..but it really doesn't help. Not any more.

A shame because I use Enfamil...and have been happy with it as a product....a product that works for me and the baby.

I don't buy because of their PROMISES...or flavors for that matter (sheesh) I buy it because I HOPE it won't kill my kid and sustain her and keep her healthy...AS healthy yes as she would be if I were bfing her.

That is all that these companies SHOULD be doing in advertising..but alas...they don't get it and probably never will..not if they can't learn from the Nestle horrors

Here's the link to the Cochrane Review on LCPUFA supplementation in term infants. In case anyone doesn't know a peer-reviewed published meta-analysis like this carries the greatest weight in terms of studies.

"This review found that feeding term infants with milk formula enriched with LCPUFA had no proven benefit regarding vision, cognition or physical growth."

http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab000376.html

Pass it on. I am going to finally sit down and write another blog tonight. Formula marketing really sets my hair on fire.

Did you know that if for some reason you can't breast feed you can make your own formula at home. Check out Sally Fallon's Nourishing Traditions for baby formula recipes and spread the word!!
.-= Kelly Klassen´s last blog ..Garlic Socks =-.

My faves are the commercials with the claim...."We have ______ , JUST LIKE those found in breastmilk." Um, the only thing that is just like breastmilk is breastmilk.

They shouldn't be claiming benefits at all. The ruling did not go far enough. But hopefully it will be passed to the FTC.

@Matianne - I used generic when I formula fed too. My Ped said it was the same exact thing as the name brand and I guess she was right!

I can't breastfeed, so that's not an option, but boy does this make me feel better about the fact that I've always used Costco or Target brand. After comparing the ingredients I've never been able to figure out why I should spend $15 more for the name brands.

This is so profoundly irresponsible. :(
.-= Amber´s last blog ..The Front of my Shirt =-.

I've gotten three formula samples from them for their toddler formula before getting my act together and calling to get off their mailing list (NOT good for my blood pressure!). It is bad enough that they have such aggressive marketing without the false advertising...
.-= Natalie´s last blog ..African Kanga Babywearing Exposed! =-.

We've been feeding our son this formula since he was born - he was a C-section and there were other complications with breastfeeding - and he loves it. He is over 7 months old and growing like crazy. We would have preferred to breastfeed but this is definitely the next best thing.