Jillian Michaels, Body Image, and Mother-Shaming

May 19th 2010

Last month, the interwebs were in an uproar over a Jillian Michaels interview in Women’s Health Magazine.  Jillian is a world-famous personal trainer who’s seen each week on The Biggest Loser, and has a very successful workout system called “30 Day Shred”, which is quite popular with mom bloggers.

Jillian announced in the May issue of Women’s Health Mag that she would not be having any babies of her own, and here’s why:

“I’m going to adopt,” Jillian says.  “I can’t handle doing that [birth] to my body.”

Many bloggers have already talked at length about this interview, but I’ll have to talk about it too because these statements are something I cannot ignore.  I also take issue with the some of the other bloggers who’ve attacked Michaels for putting down women’s post-baby bodies when they, themselves, have written books putting down women’s post-baby bodies.  Oh, the hypocrisy.  I suppose it’s okay when they do it, but not when Jillian Michaels does it.  I have an idea – how about it’s not okay when ANYBODY does it?  There.  That’s settled.

Now back to the statements.  After the mommy-blogger uproar, many women left comments on these various articles wondering why anyone would be upset with Jillian’s statement about birth to begin with.  Over at ShePosts, nearly all the commentors felt that it was nobody’s business whether or not Jillian wanted to give birth, or what her reasons were for it.

I don’t think it is anybody’s business if she doesn’t want to have children of her own.  That’s her choice to make.  I do, however, think it is her customer’s business if she, the world renowned body sculptor, thinks that a body cannot recover from childbirth.  If she really believes that, why does she bother telling mothers that they can get fit using her system?

Here’s what I’d tell Jillian, and any other woman worried about what a baby will to do her body:   Yes, a baby will change your body.  But guess what else changes your body?  TIME.

As my fiercely feminist college professor used to say, “Not a single one of us gets out of this life alive.” Not a single one of us gets out of this life looking the way we do right now, either.  I hate to break it to Jillian, but “that” is going to happen to her body whether or not she has a baby.  Aging happens.  Gravity happens.  Shit happens.

But there are some glorious and beautiful benefits to the post-baby body (other than, ya know, that whole creating-a-human thing, which is a pretty great gift in itself.)  My husband, for example, never saw the big deal in Heidi Klum, that is, until she had kids.  Now, he thinks she looks radiant, softened, and womanly.  I have to agree – she’s drop dead gorgeous now, and she’s cranked out kid after kid over the last few years.  Does everyone bounce back the way Heidi Klum did?  No, of course not.  But you’d think if anybody could bounce back from childbirth, it would be A FAMOUS PERSONAL TRAINER WITH GOBS OF MONEY.

But to hear Jillian Michaels, one might think that there simply is no recovering from “that,” and “that” is certainly so awful that no person could possibly find you attractive again.

Jeez, if “that” is so totally unappealing, doesn’t it makes you wonder how any of us gets pregnant with the second, or the fifth, or the nineteenth baby?  I’m guessing our partners like our post-baby bodies just fine, and don’t feel like “that” was so bad, otherwise they wouldn’t keep coming back for more.

Jillian did try to do some damage control on her Facebook fan page.  She said,

There is a misunderstanding circulating in the press on my personal choice to not get pregnant. I think that pregnancy is admirable and selfless. For myself, I have remnant body issues left over from childhood which leads me to make adoption my personal choice down the road.

I think it’s admirable that Jillian wants to adopt.  However, if I were a birth mother, I’d probably think twice about giving my child to a woman who didn’t want to have children of her own out of sheer vanity.  I think it’s kind of insulting to expect another woman to have a baby for you because you don’t want “that” to happen to your body, but I guess it’s okay if “that” happens to hers?!?!  What does this say about the way she’d raise the child?  Our bodies are sacred vessels, sure, but are they so sacred that they shouldn’t be used for anything other than selling workout DVDs and posing for magazine covers?  Come on, Jillian.  Certainly you can see how messed up that is.  We are meant to live.  And “God” willing, we’ll all live until these bodies are wrinkled, weathered, and completely devoid of a six-pack abdomen.  “Remnant body issues” or not, Jillian needs to have to come to terms with the fact that her  body is not going to look like this forever, and that is something she is going to have to learn to accept.

As a feminist, I do think that Jillian Michaels is a woman who has every right to feel however she wants to feel about giving birth.  Yet, I also believe that people should be holding this celebrity fitness guru accountable for making statements about the body that go against everything she tries to tell her customers.

As a business woman and entrepreneur, Jillian needs to remember that many of her customers are mothers, and they don’t want to hear somebody tell them that there’s no hope for their post-baby body.  As a matter of fact, what we need to be telling mothers is that their post-baby bodies look great, even if they don’t look like Heidi Klum, or even Heidi Klum’s fat sister “Greta.”  And at the end of our lives, me, and Jillian, and Heidi Klum are all going to be wrinkled just the same, and nobody will ever care whether birth widened our hips or not.

Maybe then, Jillian will wonder whether clinging to her body image issues was worth it…

____________________________________

UPDATE:  A commentor pointed me toward this clarification by Jillian, which states that her problems are physical infertility, and not a body image distortion.  I’m glad I wrote about this, otherwise I might never have gotten the real story and would have stayed mad at Jillian forever and ever.  Let this be a lesson to those in the media to either answer the question truthfully, or plead the 5th.  Your professional reputation may depend on it.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Earth Mama Angel Baby


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I was expecting my body to look really different (READ: bad, saggy, fat) after childbirth. Nobody had prepared me for what happened. I was at prepregnancy weight 3 days after delivery, with a perfectly flat (and aburdly tanned, since it had tanned while being stretched and thus now had more pigment per sq inch than before) smooth belly. Combined with the full G-cups I got from my milk coming in, I felt like a porn star. It was odd, I felt too sexed up to be a mom :D Luckily the breasts calmed down. I kept losing weight until I was about 10-15 lbs lighter than prepregnancy. A lot of BF'ing moms I know have had this happen.

Anyway. I just wanted to put my two cents in. It doesn't always take starvation or surgery to get back to pre-pregnancy body in weeks or even days. I could have posed in a bikini in a magazine before I got out of the hospital with my newborn :) I didn't appreciate people hating me for it. I don't know what I did, apparently my body just bounces back quick. Not my fault! :D

I'm late to the party on this, but just wanted to note: my MIL and her sister offer a test case. My MIL gave birth to three children; her sister adopted because she was too afraid to give birth. Obviously I haven't seen them naked, but they are both the same body type and around the same weight and look about the same in clothes. You would never be able to guess which one of them was a biological mother.

So many moms and expectant mothers I spoke to when researching my book (Does This Pregnancy Make Me Look Fat? The Essential Guide to Loving Your Body Before and After Baby) were worried about pregnancy and motherhood-related body changes, but they were terrified to discuss it for fear of being judged as selfish of vain. It's a double whammy--you feel bad about your body and then you beat yourself up for feeling bad because you should "know better." And we feminists are especially hard on ourselves in that department. That's why I can't judge Jillian Michaels for being honest. Unfortunately, I think the hugely negative public reaction to her statement will keep a lot of other women silent.

However, I CAN judge her for something else. I find it highly problematic that she has made her fortune telling other people how to deal with their body issues when she clearly hasn't come to terms with her own. She pretty much personifies the problem with the weight loss industry. It's all about preaching surface solutions (eat this kind of food, do this kind of exercise). The truth is food and weight struggles are usually linked to exactly the kinds of issues can bubble to surface during pregnancy and new mommyhood--perfectionism, control (or lack of it), isolation, reflections on how you were parented, the list goes on. Women who feel the way Jillian does do not need to watch this hour-long TV show or buy that $30 bottle of diet pills. They need to confront some much deeper stuff that has nothing to do with weight.
.-= Claire Mysko´s last blog ..Oprah’s Mea Culpa: “I Publicly Shamed Myself” =-.

I hate to sound uncharitable, and I really admire that you and your readers are willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. But - I'm not buying the backpedal. Gad, I'm sure this is going to sound nasty, but it just doesn't add up.

The first bit of damage control cites "body issues" she had as a kid, which actually reinforced the original interpretation of the now infamous quote - so then it became endometriosis and infertility.

I'm on the road at a rest stop, and I just checked out the original article as it appears in the magazine. The statement preceding the quote is that she has an aversion to pregnancy DUE TO BEING OVERWEIGHT AS A KID. That does not sound like endometriosis to me.

Now, another commenter made astute observations about the mercilessly critical eye with which we scrutinize celebrity post-baby bodies, and I can get behind & sympathize with that. But I'm sorry, I'm just not buying the spin. I'm not saying she doesn't have endometriosis - maybe she does. But to me, this SCREAMS publicist desperately working to limit the damage. It would have been more honest to say "Hey, it's not about bouncing back postpartum - of course you can. I just have issues with being overweight as a kid, so simply BEING pregnant would be uncomfortable to me." That would have been more real and more helpful.

I blogged about this right after the article came out. As a mother and a birthmother I was extremely offended by her cavalier attitude toward pregnancy and birth AND adoption. I did not go lightly into my decision to place my daughter for adoption and I was furious that Jillian seemed to be so casual about it. I am glad that you got the rest of the story, or at least more of it. While I feel for her infertility struggles, I still don't agree with the way she approached her choice to publicly share her desire to adopt. Part of me also wonders if she truly is infertile or if she was just saying that to try and calm people down. I suspect that if she let her body fat rise a little and stopped working out so much that she wouldn't have as many issues conceiving. But, then again, she'd have to do "that" to her body.

http://meangirl2mommy.blogspot.com/2010/04/watch-o...
.-= Jenni´s last blog ..The Rollercoaster That is Life =-.

I'm glad to read the clarification. It really does make me feel better about the whole thing.

All the same, it's interesting to me how much of a chord this struck with women. It's clearly something that a lot of us struggle with, on some level at least. I know I do. I would have my children again in a heartbeat, but I have pretty ambivalent feelings about its aftermath. I think that's OK, but I can see how it doesn't feel OK if you think someone else is looking down on your post-baby self.
.-= Amber´s last blog ..Scare Tactics =-.

I think this is an issue close to the hearts of many women, that is why it resonated and got so much press. It is a bit of a crap shoot how well a body 'bounces back' from pregnancy, and it is a scary prospect for those of us who have body control issues. Pregnancy is letting something else control that body you work so hard to rein in.

I'm much more comfortable with my body since babies, actually, partly because it doesn't really look all that different, and it did such a marvelous job growing and birthing my babies that it deserves some respect!
.-= geekymummy´s last blog ..Self portrait of Geekymummy as an urban hipster =-.

It's like saggy boobs. People still think breastfeeding makes your boobs sag. No, pregnancy makes your boobs sag. Age makes your boobs sag. Gravity makes your boobs sag. Life makes your boobs sag.

Body issues suck. Please don't call me ThunderThighs; I get PTSD. (I'm sure my dad meant well.)

Still, I agree with you: for someone who has had such an impact on mothers looking to not necessarily reclaim a pre-pregnancy body but to at least feel some KINSHIP with the body that having kids gave them, her statement was not very...*aware.* I think if I worked my ass off and built my empire on my personal-training sculpted body, I'd be really wary of letting it go to what my clients look like in their "before" photos...I don't know. My jaw is still on the floor from your Mominatrix link up there.
.-= foxy.kate´s last blog ..20% more love: To Wii or not to Wii? =-.

We are all going to get old. We are all going to get saggy and droopy. End of story.

As irritating as I find Jillian to be, I have to give her a little credit here for speaking a truth that the Hollywood media machine won't. Every other tabloid glossy mag screams "HOW I GOT MY BODY BACK!!" which just reinforces the idea that women's bodies are objects of desire, not procreation. Evidence of pregnancy must be removed immediately, whether by starvation, excessive exercise, surgery, or all three.

And has anyone else noticed how quickly these post-baby body issues are appearing? Wasn't Kendra and/or Kourtney posing in a bikini mere WEEKS after delivery?! It's terribly demoralizing, and I'm not a television star. Jillian, whether she intended to or not, shed a light on how oppressive our flat belly worship is.

Oh, Ms Michales. When she first came on the scene during the first season of TBL, I was enamored by her. I love her no bullshit attitude, no excuses, and toughness. And obviously, I longed to have her body, but that was back then when I was...well, let's just say I had some issues around body image and perfectionism. But, that's a whole different can of worms.
JM has now done nothing but annoy me. She has made it her career to look the way she does, yes, but I lost all respect for her when she started promoting diet pills. Gross. In my eyes, she's sold her soul for a buck. Or maybe a million bucks in her case. This whole baby-body controversy is just icing on the cake.
.-= Andrea Owen´s last blog ..Triggered. =-.

I just watched a Momversation video about this last night, so it's funny that now, this morning, I find your blog post about it. It certainly sounds like this is a much more complex issue than any of us originally thought... I'm torn b/c I feel empathy for her for saying something she probably shouldn't have on a magazine, which may or may not have been twisted by that magazine to make a sensationalistic headline that I *do* think was a slap in the face to all mothers (and I DO blame the MAGAZINE for that, especially now that we know the real reason Jillian won't get pregnant, it was the MAGAZINE that turned this into a "that may be fine for YOU lowly folk, but I certainly am not going to ruin MY body!" battle-- I'm wondering why no one seems to be pointing a finger at them, rather than blaming Jillian full-on... shouldn't we demand better of our reporters?).

I also think that since she is a public person, and since this IS a big issue (mothers do not need any more shame about their bodies, nor do we need to add negative stigma to pregnancy and childbirth) that she did have an obligation to clarify her point. She didn't even have to go into specifics, but saying she has "left-over body issues" certainly sounds like psychological issues, whereas she could have said, "I have some physical/medical issues that could interfere with pregnancy." I understand that this may not be as easy as that for her to say, but at the same time her words have such huge pull, as a celebrity, as one whose audience is made up largely of mothers, that there really is an obligation there on her part to be clear, out of respect for the mothers she works with/for and helps.
.-= Marcy´s last blog ..My 2yr old has cradle cap =-.

It's clearly a pretty emotional and personal topic for her. Maybe she didn't feel like going into it all on Facebook. And it's easy to say that making that comment made it our business so she should be willing to share the rest of the background... but, really, don't we all know what it's like to blurt out something we regret later, in the heat of the moment? How many of us even have a clue what it would be like to go through a three-hour interview, or be successful at watching every word we said ourselves during such a gruellingly long interview, never failing to think about possible implications, even when dealing with a particularly emotional subject right at the end? Right now I'm dealing with the fallout from having said some things I really regret during a stressful conversation when I was tired and not thinking straight, so I've got a lot of sympathy for someone else who does the same. I think maybe the real lesson here is to be really wary of reading too much into quotes reported by the media.
.-= Dr Sarah´s last blog ..To my sister, with love =-.

I'm happy to see a clarification, and I'm happy that she admitted she should have been more careful with her words. As a celebrity fitness guru, her words carry a lot of weight (no pun intended) and it's important to make sure that her customer's understand her intention.

It makes me wonder why she didn't just say this in the first place, rather than posting cryptic facebook messages clarifying nothing. It's her business, but answering half the question in a national publication made it the reader's business. I just hope more people see her clarification than read the original article. I don't like the seed that statement could plant in the mind of her readers.

Actually, there's much more to the story that, like so many things that cause a frenzy, has not gotten nearly as much press as the initial Women's Health article.

As Kayce at Hearts and Hands showed me a few days ago, Jillian has endometriosis. http://www.momlogic.com/2010/05/jillian_michaels_p...

I had the exact same sort of dismayed/outraged reaction, but her "body issues left over from childhood" apparently aren't cosmetic, but legitimately pathologic. I think we need to circulate that information around. Were it not so, I would completely be on board with this post with the same opinion, but once again, we've fallen victim to media spin served up as fact.
.-= Jena´s last blog ..My review of "Babies" =-.

I can't check the context, because that bit of the article is only available by subscribing which I don't want to do. But do we actually have enough context to be sure that she was talking about the appearance of her body post-birth? There are a lot of possible reasons apart from vanity why a woman might be frightened or disturbed by the idea of another person living inside them for nine months and then being forcibly ejected through an exceedingly intimate orifice. The fact that she brings up childhood issues does make me think that there's more going on here than just vanity. Unless it's really clear from other things she said, I'd be very wary of assuming that's all that's going on here. It's too easy to take a single comment out of context when you don't know the full story.

Also, do bear in mind that just because a person is planning to adopt it doesn't follow that she 'expects' someone else to have a baby for her. Adoption isn't supposed to be about 'expecting' someone else to have a baby for you (sadly, it far too often is, but that's a whole separate rant and we can't assume that that's what Jillian Whatsit is thinking). It's supposed to be about recognising that, for a multitude of reasons, there are a lot of women in the world who *are* having children that they choose not to keep or are not in a position to keep, and considering whether to be a mother to one of those children. I hope that made sense - I'm typing in kind of a rush.