Parenting: UR Doin It Rong

Jul 17th 2011

Lately, I’ve learned one essential fact about parenting from blogs and mainstream media, and from those who comment on blogs and mainstream media. Apparently, no matter what I do or do not do as a parent, I am wrong. The fact that I even AM a parent is wrong. It’s all just wrong, wrong, wrong.

According to LZ Granderson at CNN.com, if your small child has the audacity to act like, well, a small child, then you,

“lack the fortitude to properly discipline them, in public and at home. And we know you don’t discipline them at home because you don’t possess “the look.” If you had “the look,” you wouldn’t need to say “sit down” a thousand times.

LZ stopped short of explaining exactly what “the look” is supposed to communicate, other than something that seems suspiciously like “I will beat you with a belt in the bathroom if you open your stupid little mouth again.” Short of threatening children with physical violence, WHAT is “the look” supposed to convey, anyway?

Most people who’ve had a few toddlers know that toddlers will be toddlers, and you could actually take them into the bathroom and beat them with a belt, and it STILL will not stop them from annoying people at the grocery store. It would, however, screw the kid up, and probably get you charged with child abuse. So, LZ, exactly what does your “look” mean to your child? Something tells me that it says a LOT about what goes on at your house, and it ain’t good.

But don’t get me wrong – as a parent of two incredibly rambunctious boys, I have made my fair share of angry commands through clenched teeth across a dinner table where my food is getting cold and my temper is getting hot BECAUSE I have said “sit down” a thousand times, to absolutely no avail. I could threaten, cajole, distract, or even beg, but if the child wants to stand, I am powerless against him.

Just today, we stopped at Panera while we were out running the million weekend errands. The kids ordered their favorites, and when the food came, Jules took one look at the Mac N Cheese and declared that he wasn’t hungry. Since he wouldn’t eat, that meant he wouldn’t sit down in his chair either, so he wandered to a nearby booth to continue announcing loudly that he was happily refusing to eat the $8 meal we just bought him. I was nursing the baby and my food hadn’t even come yet, so it’s not like I could just jump up and drag him out of the restaurant. All I could do was try to breathe and hope that nobody was paying any attention to him.

Just then, I heard the woman at the booth next to us explaining to her older son that he and his brothers used to be just like that. The boy must have complained about Julesy being annoying or something, so the mom launched into this story about how she would take the kids to dinner, let them order exactly what they wanted, and as soon as the food came, they’d refuse to eat it. The boy didn’t believe her, but she swore to him that it was true. How funny is it that this kid had NO recollection of terrorizing his poor mother at dinner?

I’m guessing Mike Vuick, owner of McDain’s Restaurant in Pittsburgh, has no recollection of what it’s like to be a child either, since he has banned the little bastards* from his establishment all together. But it’s not just him – the many commentors agree with his new policy. Apparently, most of society thinks we cannot control our children (they’re right) and that children are downright annoying to everyone else in the world. One commentor suggested that we don’t discipline our children because we’re afraid of looking mean in public.

She is totally right.

We CAN’T give our children “the look” because somebody will write a whole blog about what a horrible parent we are and accuse us of having “broken” our children if we try to tell them to cut their shit out in public (despite not having seen the before, or after, or the rest of this parent/child relationship.)

Have you ever been at your wit’s end in the checkout line at Target because you had to go there to buy toilet paper, and the children spent the entire trip trying to rip shit off the shelves, scream because you won’t buy them every colorful box they spotted in the store, and cry because you refuse to top them off with an Icee on the way out after their behavior almost drove you to drink Drano the middle of aisle 6? Have you ever looked at your child in line after an hour of tantrum-throwing and begging, and just snapped, “NO! YOU WILL NOT BE GETTING AN ICEE, SO STOP IT NOOOOOW!”

Well, if Single Dad Laughing is behind you in line, then “Congratulations”, he thinks “you’ve just broken your child.” And if LZ Granderson is in line next to you, then he thinks you’re too stupid to control your kids. And if Mike Vuick is setting the policy at Target, then he’ll just kick you and your brats out and tell you never to return.

If you are a parent, you are damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. If you don’t give your children the “I will beat you” look, then you are being a spineless, permissive parent. If you DO give them the “If you ask me for ice cream one more time I will scream” look, then you’re an abusive parent. And if your kids are having a “well-behaved” moment and you don’t even have to shoot them these death stares, it doesn’t matter, because some other parent has already screwed it up for you and you’re not allowed in the restaurant anyway.

Perhaps, just maybe, NOBODY has a lock on this parenting gig, and we’re all just trying to get through the day. Perhaps nobody can control a toddler in a bad mood, and what looks like a mom ignoring the behavior is actually the mother going catatonic as a form of self preservation. And perhaps the father growled “You’re not getting ice cream” because, five minutes prior, the kid sucker-punched Dad in the balls after he refused to buy the boy the latest Pokemon (which just happened to my husband, only it was a Disney Princess marker set that the kid wanted, which we decided not to buy because he has 1,492 marker sets in this house already.)

In a world where parenting is a thankless job that everyone can (supposedly) do better than you, thank god we have Louis CK to be the one voice of reason. His answer? Nobody gets out of parenthood alive. Nobody. Not even you.

(WARNING: This video is hilarious. It is also filled with cuss words. I mark it Rated R for Adults with a Sense of Humor. Enjoy.)

For so many reasons, I just give up. I’m doing it all wrong, and that’s fine by me. As long as my kids are happy and healthy, I’ve done the best I can. And so have you.

*UM, NOTE? I am NOT calling kids “little bastards” here, I’m jokingly saying that the owner of the restaurant must think his Under 6 patrons are little bastards – which is why he doesn’t want them around. It seems some people didn’t understand that.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Earth Mama Angel Baby


Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Wow. There is a world of acceptable and effective parenting between letting your kids act like animals in public and being mean like the no ice cream dad. Are y'all really that dense that you can't understand that? To this query "Have you ever been at your wit’s end in the checkout line at Target because you had to go there to buy toilet paper, and the children spent the entire trip trying to rip shit off the shelves, scream because you won’t buy them every colorful box they spotted in the store, and cry because you refuse to top them off with an Icee on the way out after their behavior almost drove you to drink Drano the middle of aisle 6?" I would say, no, I have not. I am really not sure how things get to this point with people and their kids. Maybe they have more of them than they can properly handle? Maybe they really aren't paying attention to the kids along the way and this is the kids acting out. But, it just does not happen to me, and yes, I do judge. KNOWING your children and knowing how to manage them is a skill parents should put more effort into cultivating. No, you can't completely control another human being but you sure can MANAGE them. Parents whose kids act like this are, simply put, bad managers and ought to find alternatives to bringing the kids out in situations that are stressful and embarrassing, if only for their own peace.

Wow it must feel great to be perfect. There is a lot of grey area between there, yes, and it can get judged too. And god forbid you have a child with issues and need to go to a store, even once. I have three kids and they are not all equally easy or difficult to "manage".

Again with the extremes. Nobody is "perfect" of course, and my kid has raised her voice to a yell in public, has ordered food and not eaten it, etc. The difference, though, is I shut down the situation before it escalates. What works for my child may not work for others' children, so I won't go into how, specifically, I handle my child. However, it is really the parents' responsibility to find out what does work and to be active in teaching their children how to behave out in the public world. There is no reason at all why a child should be wandering around a restaurant bothering other patrons by looking at them, trying to start up conversations with them or whatnot. Give the kid a Gameboy, Ipod or whatever, or, better yet, a book or crayons and pad...or, and this is totally revolutionary, actually engage the child in conversation! Teach him that, no, he can't go wandering around the restaurant. It's just. not. done. If you let him do it once and again and again, it sets the precedent. If you shut it down, then he learns.

There was nothing implying extremes about my response, you called everyone sympathizing with getting judged from both sides of the fence "dense" and I think you come across like you think you are perfect. In fact I think you picked two extremes in the article. (Like people with some very intense children have never thought about avoiding the restaurant, or "shutting it down" or engaging in conversation! That is the type of judgment that can be infuriating.) The point of this post and many comments wasn't saying that it's OK to let your kids misbehave in public. The point is that (besides being easier said than done) is that you can judged no matter what you. You COULD be doing just what you say, and some will still think you're mean, some will think it's not strict enough. I have handled my kids in restaurants (the rare occasion we go) quite well and have been complimented on it. And yet I can relate entirely to this article. But good for you, you have a (singular I see) seemingly manageable kid. Good luck if you have more. You know what they say about karma.

Ya, sorry, can't relate. Not my thing.

When I first saw the title of this post, I thought it was going to be something about people mangling written English, (not just in a minor misspellings or unimpressive semantics sort of way, but in a "I m 2 bz r kool dint evr lern how 2 use r tipe hole words" way), and how it's hard to take people seriously when they write like that.

This post has had me thinking about it and related topics all day, generally in a good way. I'll probably blog about my thoughts later. I would go so far as to say I appreciate almost all of your posts I've read. Ironically, I also think generally good things about most of what Dan at SDL writes.

I think you're right that alot of people (me included) make alot of unnecessary, unfair snap judgements. I also think that alot of people in our "there must be consequences!" society are, frankly, mean to their children.

In the post mentioned by SDL, I didn't get the impression it was the denial of ice cream, but the other behavior exhibited by the father that Dan was offended by. And if it really happened the way he said it did, I probably wouldn't have been thinking kind things about that father either.
Also, there lots of moments when I think someone else could do a better job with my kids - someone who has the same values and goals for children that I do, but who is exhausted, stressed by other situations, or just, for the moment, tired of my particular child's particular manifestation of "spirited."

I like the idea of offering help or at least a sentiment of solidarity to parents who seem to be struggling in public situations, but find they are often turned down, and as has been noted above, what to one person is an offer to assist or empathize is to another person nosy, insulting, condescending bitchiness. Of course, I'll still probably offer to help if I think there's a way I can.

I'm of the opinion that if you *try* to discipline your child and stop them from running amok, you're doing it right. It's the parents who don't try that bother me. Yes, children scream in the line at the grocery store. It happens. But having worked in the grocery store and seen parents expect the store employees to be the ones to tell their children "no" when the kid is on the verge of maiming himself or someone else, I've also seen parents who don't seem to care what their children are doing as long as it's not their problem.

The point is, there are all kinds of parents. Some are awesome and I want to spend time with them and their children. Some have methods of childrearing that are so at odds with my own that I'd rather not spend time with them.

I don't have any objection to a restaurant stating themselves to be a child free facility. It's their right. If I don't like it, then I have the right to vote with my feet.

It's just not so simple as "you're doing it wrong" or "everyone else needs to allow my children to be children." There's a time and a place for everything, but not everything should be at every time and every place.

But even this type of assumption can be flat out wrong in many situations, b/c as has been said, not all kids are the same and not all efforts at discipline are going to look the same. Some people would think I'm not "trying" b/c I can't be 1000% authoritative and instantly instill fear and compliance (I don't want to do that, actually). Some would assume you are not trying b/c they have no clue that your child has behavioral issues and would only behave worse if you "tried" the way they think you should, so perhaps I should just get through the check out as fast as possible (assuming he's not hurting someone). Sure some parents don't try. Some suck, as parents and as nonparents. But I think the point of the article is that people are making a lot of snap judgments left and right about parents and kids they know nothing about. I think it all boils down to a lot of societal disrespect for mothers and lack of understanding about children. Disciplining children is hard, some are harder than others. You don't always know when someone is trying or isn't.

I supposed I shouldn't be surprised, but I am actually shocked they would publish such a one-sided, hateful rant that seriously calls children "brats" on CNN. Great journalism. I like how the comments actually blame behavioral disorders and medication on lazy parenting. I'll just bet those parents will be happy to hear they only have to work harder to make it easier!

But I am right there with you. You absolutely cannot win. No doubt. Early on I realized how often people would stare at me to make sure I was going to buckle my child in if I put the groceries down before buckling him, or that I was there when I could see my child but the other person couldn't see me watching him. What I realized is that they weren't being helpful, b/c there was always anger in their eyes. It's not concern for the child. There is this assumption that mothers are doing it wrong and have to be checked on. People seem to assume the worst. Good parenting is invisible. That they don't notice. But any time they act like kids, watch out.

I thought I stopped caring but my third child is pretty intense (people? kids are different! get that in your head. some are harder than others) and I recently had a shitty experience where I was given dirty looks for the option A and also for option B. Literally could not win.

I have also worried that I was A) being unAP or judged for being mean or B) judged for not having my kids under robotic control. But worrying that people will think you are either lax or BREAKING YOUR CHILD (I hate SDL!!! he's an ass, and a sexist too) will only mess up your parenting and your instincts. Of course we know that how we treat them is more important than what stupid strangers think- even ones with the chance to rage on CNN.

OMG, SlackerInc, you've obviously missed the point of this blog post because you're too busy telling people how to make their kids work with a form of discipline that doesn't work for that kid, or making judgements on parenting based on things you've seen. You're no better than SDL and his rash judgement of a parent he saw for a few minutes in line at a store!

If we're going off of things we've only seen, I would say that you think everyone should follow your style of parenting, period. And that you think a parent isn't trying hard enough if they aren't following your own style. What works for *your family* is great, but trying to tell others what to do with their family is simply arrogant. That's what I took from this blog post. Because it is.

Case in point: I've been meeting with the same moms group every week for the last five years. Our oldest kids are all within a few months of each other in age, and each one of them responds to the same discipline in different ways. Why? Because they're *different people* from *different families* with *different temperaments*. Even in the same family there are different reactions to disciplines used because once again, they're all *different people*. Obviously you haven't had that problem, which is great, but it's not the reality for others.

How about instead of being a part of the problem (telling other parents how they're wrong because they're not doing exactly what you do), be a part of the solution, which is the support good parents need to do what is best for their own family, even if you don't agree with it?

As I said upthread, the whole "every family is unique and you can't possibly know what would work for others" mentality is just one I have no patience for. Is this also true for adults, then? If so, does that mean that psychologists and sociologists are wasting their time because they do not know every person in the world individually? Should we give up on having laws and social norms because everyone's different? Pffft.

BTW, I'm flattered that you compared me to SLD because I thought his post was spot on.

Does it strike anyone else that there an awful lot of children who respond to no discipline, and that those of us who have things going wwell are just lucky? And here I thought parenting mattered. If you get what you get and how we parent doesn't matter... why are we trying?

The point is this: NObody has all of parenting figured out. My grandma swears up and down that my grandfather's "tough love" style of parenting would straighten my boys out. Really Grandma? Let's see - my dad (her son) was 14 - yes FOURTEEN - when I was born, most of her seven sons never graduated high school, NONE of them would speak to my grandfather as adults, and the most disastrous day in my family's whole history was the day that my uncle (her son) took his own life. Yet to hear my grandma tell it, she knows how to raise flawless, well adjusted adults HER way. I've found that the people who insist they're doing it all right are the ones who are probably doing it the most wrong.

It's not just you get what you get. It is about recognizing that it is incredibly difficult to figure out what 'works' with each kid. Most are trying their asses off. When we were brought to earth and dipped into hell by our kid we started trying harder with that kid AND the others. Maybe the new stuff will work. Maybe it won't. Ginger, you're not lucky, you've just found a place where your parenting style works with your children. It could change and others are simply trying to find their own good place.

When you say "most are trying their asses off", do you mean most of the parents who are posting here on this blog? Or most parents, period, out there in the general public? Because if the former, I agree (though they may in some cases be "trying" in a flawed way that is doomed to failure). If the latter, then I disagree. It's pretty easy to see, if you spend much time out in public and especially if you work in the schools as I have, that most parents are not really trying all that hard. They are people who had sex because it felt good and then a baby came out and they are just kind of dealing with it, minimally in many cases. I do really wish I didn't have to be so jaded and pessimistic, but it's just what I see.

I would be meaning- most parents I know. I also know a few who are not trying and some who leave it up to, and blame when things go wrong, the school system to raise their kid(s). I suppose if I am looking at it in a wider spectrum like that I would have to agree with you on many points about child management here, SlackerInc.In that view, it is the parents that are being banned from the restaurant for failing to turn out compliant children or have the sense to pack it up when they fall apart. I have also reminded myself why I tend to avoid the comment sections. This is brutal! I had made the comment elsewhere that I, honestly, prefer to not sit near rowdy/restless/screaming or otherwise high volume children on date night but certainly wouldn't consider it the end of the world. I got a few comments about how I was awful for trying to "forget" my kids or get away from children while I was out. Apparently I just don't love them enough.

Ah! A pro-choicer then?

Does that really have anything to do with the discussion?

Who, me? Yes, I am pro-choice before viability, though that doesn't mean I think having an abortion is a good thing. It's just not something that should be flat out illegal.

Why do you ask?

I think we can all come to a happy medium here; people need to accept that toddlers often misbehave, no matter WHAT disciplinary tactics are/aren't being applied. In fact, I clearly remember hating shopping as a young child, and knowing that the worse I behaved, the sooner we'd go home. So people need to cut parents some slack, because we all need to take our kids out in public at times.

On the other hand, I'm perfectly OK with certain restaurants banning kids if they feel that's not really the sort of place they're running. When I pay money to get a babysitter so my husband and I can have dinner out, why do I want to listen to someone else's whiny 2-year-old? We don't eat out at "family restaurants," we pick a place we should reasonably expect to be child-free by 7 PM. I'm talking about young children here; if you're there with your 10-year-old who knows how to behave, that's fine by me.

The problem I see is when people act like Outback Steakhouse is the place where they shouldn't experience any other child's noise. Seriously - at Outback? WTF. I had a couple shooting us death glares when I took my cousin's daughter to Outback before I had my own kids (she wasn't even doing anything wrong). So what qualifies as a place that's not for children? Some people think Outback - other people know that it's a place with white linen on the tables and NO kid's menu. I think we should trust that most parents are not going to eat out at a really fancy restaurant late at night with their kids. Most people have common sense.

That's the funny thing, I've taken my daughter to a few restaurants for Restaurant Week and she's been welcomed even though those restaurants have no kids menu. I was looking at the menu of a similar place while on a walk with her in the Ergo and an employee saw us and told me they had high chairs (but no kids menu in sight).
I totally agree with your wtf at people not expecting to see kids in an Outback, though.

Thank you, thank you, thank you for writing this!

"One commentor suggested that we don’t discipline our children because we’re afraid of looking mean in public.

She is totally right."

I think this is at the heart of this article. The author says he has mastered the look to control his children. Now you immediately assume he beats them. You are doing what you are afraid other are going to do to you.

Listen...

I think we need to stop seeing parent intervention as being mean but rather as simply parenting. We need to stop worrying about other mothers, or looking cool, and actually parent our kids.

Temper tantrums are like a hand grenade. Once the pin has been pulled, you gotta get them out of there. Then the child will learn tantrums won't get attention. Parents have to do this every time. I have 3 kids, it works. Yep, I am embarrassed when its happening, and yep, I've had to leave behind a dinner, or a cart full of groceries, but in the long run it is worth the effort. My older kids haven't had a tantrum or acted up in years and I'm working with my 2 year old now. Its a process. A learning opportunity.

Discipline and setting behavior boundaries are NOT BREAKING our kids, its FIXING them. Screw the guy behind you at Target if he doesn't get it!

There is no need for hitting, shouting, spanking, or swatting if you are CONSISTENT in your rules. Temper tantrums go home. No getting up at dinner or no dessert. No reward for naughty (albeit normal) behavior.

IWe are losing the ability to handle our own children. If someone thinks kids are going to be perfect - they are fools I tell you - but parents need to STOP trying to look cool and fun and start parenting their kids again. Who cares what someone else thinks, this is about socializing your kids. And mothers need to stop judging each other so that we can do our jobs with a little less stress.

(Mother of 2, 5, and 8 year olds)

Most of these comments reinforce for me the opinion that everyone would have been better off if the people who complained or passed judgement had simply said, "Is there anyone I can do to help?"

There used to be a time when most other mothers (older sisters, aunts, grandmas, etc.) would take it on themselves to lend a hand if a child was acting up, at least in the small towns where I lived as a child. I still do, because I remember very well what it was like when mine were small (the urge to say "My kids? Oh no, those aren't MY kids!"). Not only does that give a harrassed parent a break, but it may help the child realize that the parent isn't the only one who finds the behavior unacceptable. And a distraction offered by a stranger is often more effective anyway, because it's something different than the parent's usual response.

TV and air conditioning have helped isolate us from each other, by closing up our houses (so we stay inside instead of on the porch or in the yard where we can interact with each other) and focusing our attention on a make-believe world instead of the real one. Parenting is only one of the aspects of life that has suffered.

Good point. My 2 year old son - also a bam-bam - had a nervous break down in a store this weekend. I took him outside and sat him on the grass so he could finish his hysteria without bothering anyone. A woman walking by stopped and started talking to him. My first reaction was "mind your own business" but she completely distracted him and it felt so nice to have someone be kind in this situation. She ended up talking him into taking off his shirt (sounds weird but it was cute and well over 90 degrees out) and it sort of reset his tone.

The kindness of strangers goes a LONG way.

Hehe, opinions on parenting are like a**holes - everybody's got one. Even people like me, who do not have any kids (yet). And yes, there will always be someone who tells you you're doing it wrong.

The best thing about it? A strategy that may work like a charm with one child may be a disaster for the next child (from the same family). I think all you can do is try and see what works for you and your child, and hope that despite all the mistakes you're likely to make on the way, they will turn out great.

(My take on beating children - my parents used to beat me and my sisters, and miraculously, we've turned out pretty fine. The BF, on the other hand, who was beat by his a**hole grandfather... well, let's say I took a close look at how he handles our cats and our friends' kids before I decided to keep him and maybe even have children with him. I will not repeat that special mistake our (grand)parents made.)

I feel your pain.
What irks me about many people is that they just don't realize that children are people too. Just because they are short doesn't make them any less of a person.
When they want something that they can't have they can get angry and/or frustrated. Children, especially toddlers, don't always have the means of expressing themselves so they scream, throw stuff, sit on the floor and pout, etc. when they don't get their own way. They also get frustrated if they are unable to communicate what they are trying to communicate.
Great blog by the way.

This is exactly what I'm thinking. Of course we can't control them without screwing them up. They're people. We can teach them, we can encourage them, we can nurture them, we can fill-in-the-blank-with-your-choice-verb them, but in the end, they're people, and if they're perfectly *controlled*, then they're probably living in fear. And that's not okay.

I don't even care if they're happy or healthy. Alive and not in prison are my new standards. Love the post and love the clip.

Love this post.
I hate trying to eat out with the kids. My 6 month old isn't so bad yet, but my 2 1/2 yr old, well he just never stops. He jumps up and down on the booth while eating(when he decides to). I always look for a booth in a corner, hopefully with a window. That usually gives me a few extra minutes to possibly eat.
And the grocery store lately. . . He has just been incorrigible. I try to leave him with my husband whenever I can. Which makes me feel horribly guilty bc his brother, the 6 month old, goes everywhere with me bc he is breastfed.
SO most days I just sit home and play with the kids and make my husband run out bc I just can't bring myself to leave the house with them. . . :p

I parent the way I feel is important and really don't give a flyin... What other people think of it. I'm not out there to please a bunch of strangers- I'm out there trying to raise thoughtful, strong, self-confident, fulfilled daughters.

It is human nature to "judge". We are creatureswho need categories to make sense of the world.

I admit - I judge parents who threaten their kids (omg- the things I've heard in checkout lines), I absolutely judge parents who hit their kids, who ignore their kids...

My judgements are mine. Their parenting is theirs

We will reap what we sow

Ah, the joys and pains of an "information society". Used to, you only had to put up w/ the dirty looks of the small number of people you came in daily contact with. Now it's a free-for-all w/ the whole planet!!

Personally, I think my 3 yr old kiddo SHOULD be at least a little afraid of me. I am not averse to the OCCASIONAL swat on the bottom in response to something like running off in the parking lot. I would much rather her fear the sting of my hand on her bottom than her be hit by a car. I think that is good parenting. Sure, some other kids wouldn't need that occasional physical reminder, but it's been the only thing that will really get her attention sometimes.

Every child is different. Period. If your child doesn't fear you, who will they fear? Juvi/jail/prison IS a very real end point for kids who never learn how to respect boundaries. It's always a tight rope, and, as a good friend of mine says, you have to decide which way you are going to fail.

Yes! Thank you so much! Now I'll never have to have another discussion on my parenting skills with my (CHILDLESS!) older brother because I am sending him the link to this right now.

I recently had a 40-something woman scowl at me and tell me that I should control my children when they were a bit rammy at effing Chipotle. Yes, they were being loud... laughing.

Damn those laughing children, all their happiness and joy, it is so annoying and so disgusting, it totally ruins my meal that I purchased cafeteria-style in a "fast casual" restaurant that is 1/2 a step up from Burger King.

I hear you, sister. I had an older couple throwing daggers with their eyes at my 18 month old (who I now know is spirited, but who had also been cooped up in a car for 4 hours before this happened) at ... wait for it ... KFC. Kentucky Fried Freaking Chicken, and they thought they had a right not to see my child walking around near their table. He wasn't destroying anything, yelling or being loud, or bothering them, he was just exercising his legs. People need to get over themselves.

I have "the look." And you know what? That still doesn't work. Yes I love my kids with all my heart, but yeah, when they get in their moods, they are like little terrorists. I say that tongue in cheek, mind you. But it is true. If my 2 year old does what she does now when she's 16, I swear I'll call the cops on her! lol! And yes, getting sucker punched in the balls for not doing something your kid wants right then and there sucks big time.

AMAZING! AMAZING! AMAZING! You put in words what so many parents feel! Thank you Gina! Shared it! ;)

Although, I don't have children, I understand very well the concept of the "terrorist child" because I was one. From the age of 3 to 9 or so, I wreaked havoc---unprovoked tantrums, throwing and breaking things (usually the most expensive item on hand at the moment), cursing, etc. Both of my parents had the "look" and were not unfamiliar with the belt. No matter; both implicit and explicit threats of punishment had no effect and often exacerbated my behavior. My brothers, who were 1 and 2 years older, couldn't have been more different. Who knows why?

The upside to the story is that I eventually became a model student, valedictorian, then the only college graduate in my blue collar family and a well-adjusted, successful adult. There was no change in parenting methods, no miraculous conversion...it just happens. Hope this gives some relief to the mothers of terror-children out there!

So he may not need prison time? YAAAAAAyyyy!!! ;)

One of my (half dozen) siblings was a terror child too. As in, throwing rocks through windows as a preschooler, throwing chairs at his teacher in second grade, constant playground fights, etc, kind of terror child. Bless my generally patient, always non-violent mother (though sometimes screaming mother), and his amazing second grade teacher. He is now one of the kindest, most sedate adult men I've ever met. I honestly do not believe any amount of punishment (or "consequences"), physical or emotional could have yielded a better result.

I agree with u. Enough said. Ps, the video was hilarious

Holy crap, that video is my life. :) Thank you for the post. I feel constantly judged if I let my son have too much freedom and judged if I grab his arm to restrain him from destroying a store display. We will never ever win.

This restaurant thing can go so many ways. One thing for sure- few will agree on it. As for the kids driving us to drink in the public eye, I must share this blog post with you. I had to read it twice because I was laughing so hard. It is totally MY LIFE but with more kids:

http://myeffingcookbook.blogspot.com/2011/06/grocery-store-drama.html

ha. I meant the post was totally like my life only I have more kids. NAK

Well said. I am the mother of the 3 year old child who can go from sweetheart to terrorist in less than 10 seconds. I've gotten the all the comments and usually respond with "how very nice of you to MAKE FUN OF A CHILD" said loudly enough to embarrass the commenter.

Here's my issue. My part-time terrorist is a girl. And I have a really hard time telling her to be quiet. The feminist mom in me wants her to be loud, unafraid and to use her voice. I also want her to get angry and feel that she is allowed to get angry and show it. That there is a whole different standard of "well-behaved" expected for girls. Rambunctious boys" will be boys" but rambunctious girls, a threat to society.
Would love to hear your thoughts on this as a new parent to a girl.

Cheers!

Oh god, you're asking a question I cannot even begin to answer. I have no idea how I'll try to walk that line (yet.) Right now I'm busy trying to pretend that my 3 month old is going to stay this age for the rest of her life.

Just wait. When someone tells your girl to be quiet your feminist blood will boil.

It is a tough line to walk; wanting her to behave but being proud when she doesn't.

And how is she 3 months already?

Cheers!

I have two very "strong-willed" or "spirited" girls. In what I consider a truly feminist fashion, I discipline them the same way I would a boy exhibiting the same behaviors. I was fortunate to be turned towards the Positive Discipline books by Jane Nelsen, Alfie Kohn, and the Continuum Concept fairly early in parenting, and I really think it helped me with them. There are ABSOLUTELY times when I find their confidence, volume, persistence and tenacity so frustrating I want to slam my head against a wall. I give myself pep-talks, try to think about how those traits will work in their favor later, and send them to their grandmother or a friend's.